REVIEW ARTICLE


Microbial Diversity of Mer Operon Genes and Their Potential Rules in Mercury Bioremediation and Resistance



Martha M. Naguib1, Ahmed O. El-Gendy2, Ahmed S. Khairalla2, *
1 Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Post Graduate Studies for Advanced Sciences, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt
2 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 2406
Abstract HTML Views: 919
PDF Downloads: 314
ePub Downloads: 489
Total Views/Downloads: 4128
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 645
Abstract HTML Views: 433
PDF Downloads: 229
ePub Downloads: 164
Total Views/Downloads: 1471



© 2018 Naguib et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Microbiology and immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt, Tel: +2-012-234-76015; E-mails: ahmed.elgendy@pharm.bsu.edu.eg, ahmedkhairalla@pharm.bsu.edu.eg


Abstract

Background:

Mercury is a toxic metal that is present in small amounts in the environment, but its level is rising steadily, due to different human activities, such as industrialization. It can reach humans through the food chain, amalgam fillings, and other sources, causing different neurological disorders, memory loss, vision impairment, and may even lead to death; making its detoxification an urgent task.

Methods:

Various physical and chemical mercury remediation techniques are available, which generally aim at: (i) reducing its mobility or solubility; (ii) causing its vaporization or condensation; (iii) its separation from contaminated soils. Biological remediation techniques, commonly known as bioremediation, are also another possible alternative, which is considered as cheaper than the conventional means and can be accomplished using either (i) organisms harboring the mer operon genes (merB, merA, merR, merP, merT, merD, merF, merC, merE, merH and merG), or (ii) plants expressing metal-binding proteins. Recently, different mer determinants have been genetically engineered into several organisms, including bacteria and plants, to aid in detoxification of both ionic and organic forms of mercury.

Results:

Bacteria that are resistant to mercury compounds have at least a mercuric reductase enzyme (MerA) that reduces Hg+2 to volatile Hg0, a membrane-bound protein (MerT) for Hg+2 uptake and an additional enzyme, MerB, that degrades organomercurials by protonolysis. Presence of both merA and merB genes confer broad-spectrum mercury resistance. However, merA alone confers narrow spectrum inorganic mercury resistance.

Conclusion:

To conclude, this review discusses the importance of mercury-resistance genes in mercury bioremediation. Functional analysis of mer operon genes and the recent advances in genetic engineering techniques could provide the most environmental friendly, safe, effective and fantastic solution to overcome mercuric toxicity.

Keywords: Mercury, Mercury toxicity, Biogeochemical cycle, Mercury remediation, Resistance mechanisms, Mer operon.