Effect of Steeping Duration and Inoculum Concentration on Growth Promotion of Seedlings of Food Crops Primed in Cultures of Bacillus spp from Rhizosphere
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Steeping Duration and Inoculum Concentration on Growth Promotion of Seedlings of Food Crops Primed in Cultures of Bacillus spp from Rhizosphere

The Open Biotechnology Journal 08 Nov 2023 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/18740707-v17-230927-2023-4

Abstract

Aims:

Seed priming represents a viable, low-cost approach to improving germination and plant growth. This study aimed to assess the effects of steeping duration and inoculum concentration of seed crops on germinability enhancement of seed primed in cultures of Bacillus species from rhizospheres. The seeds used were cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), soya bean (Glycine max), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), sesame (Sesamum indicum), and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus).

Methods:

A total of five Bacillus species (four species of B. cereus and one species of B. thuringiensis) were used for priming the seeds. For the effect of steeping duration on germinability, viable surface-sterilized seeds were primed in growth broth cultures of the respective isolates. Every one hour, for a five-hour duration, a known number of seeds were withdrawn from the cultures and sown. In the case of initial inoculum, seeds were steeped in different dilutions of the bacterial cultures at the optimal steeping duration obtained in the first study before planting. At the expiration of planting duration, final germination percentage, germination time, germination index, and seedling vigor index of the respective seeds were estimated.

Results:

The results highlight the importance of steeping duration for seeds such as cowpea and soybean, and the effect of inoculum concentration was less drastic than that of steeping duration.

Conlcusion:

Further field studies need to be carried out to validate these results, using results here as baseline data.

Keywords: Rhizobacteria, Germinability, Growth promotion, Seedlings, Plant vigor, Bacillus.

1. INTRODUCTION

Currently, plant productivity in agricultural production is heavily reliant on the use of synthetic agrochemicals. Backer et al. [1] posited that a new agricultural revolution is needed to meet the nutritional needs of a growing world population, especially in the face of the huge environmental cost associated with the use of agrochemicals. In line with this mantra of environmental sustainability, La Torre-Ruiz et al. [2] and Gamez et al. [3] proposed the use of nutrient-solubilizing PGPB (plant growth-promoting bacteria) as substitutes to help reduce the dependence on synthetic agrochemicals. Microorganisms actively involved in crop production are generally termed plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) [4].

Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) refers to soil bacteria that occur freely in the soil or in close association with plant roots and have beneficial effects on crop productivity [5]. Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are known to promote plant growth and health under various environmental conditions [2, 6-8]. They possess the ability to regulate hormones and metabolic processes that can help prevent the adverse effects of environmental stress. Mechanisms of plant growth promotion include but are not limited to nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, siderophore and phytochemical production, and production of volatile growth enhancement chemicals [9-11].

McDonald [12] defined seed priming as the steeping of seeds in solutions containing the priming agent of interest to allow for the initiation of the germination process but not actual germination, followed by seed drying. It can be used to enhance seed germination capacity under a variety of environmental conditions [13, 14]. Seed priming can also promote seedling development [13].

Common methods of seed priming include hydropriming (with water), osmopriming (with mannitol, polyethylene glycol, and glycerol), hormonal priming (with gibberellins, salicylic acid, and ascorbic acid), biopriming (with microorganisms or biological compounds), and solid-matrix priming (with insoluble matrices, such as sand, vermiculite, peat, or charcoal) [14]. Seed priming can enhance seed performance, particularly concerning germination rate and uniformity, thereby promoting better seedling stand and crop development [15]. However, no priming technique is effective across various crop species, and varying degrees of effectiveness may be observed between varieties of a particular crop [14, 16].

Biopriming entails hydration with the use of biological agents [17]. Seed biopriming results in bacterial colonization of seeds [18] and improves rhizosphere colonization, and decreases plant susceptibility to stress, diseases, and adverse environmental conditions [19]. Steeping of seeds in bacterial suspensions kick-starts physiological processes that enhance germination [20]. Biopriming using rhizosphere bacteria has been applied on several crops [21-25].

Beneficial bacterial strains can enhance nutrient supply, secrete plant growth regulators [1, 26], solubilize important nutrients [27, 28] or inhibit plant pathogens and increase resistance to stress conditions [29]. Saleem et al. [30] stated that these benefits are in tandem with the principles of sustainable agriculture.

Therefore, given the established efficacy of microorganisms as bio-primers, there is a need for proper calibration of priming parameters for effective and efficient application. To this end, this study was carried out to investigate the effects of inoculum concentration and steeping duration on the germinability enhancement of seeds primed in broth cultures of growth-promoting Bacillus species isolated from soil rhizospheres. The experimental crops used in this study were selected due to their economic importance in Nigeria.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Bacterial Isolation

The bacterial strains used for the study were isolated from rhizospheres within Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. Isolation was carried out using the standard pour-plating technique. Representative colonies from the pour plating were streaked on nutrient agar plates to obtain pure cultures. The pure cultures were then stored as nutrient agar slants at 4 oC ± 2 oC until when needed.

2.2. Test Seeds

A total of 5 seeds comprising cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), soya bean (Glycine max), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), sesame (Sesamum indicum), and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) were used in this study and were obtained from a local market in Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria and used for this study.

The seeds were identified and authenticated at the Herbarium of the Department of Plant Sciences, University of Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria and the following voucher numbers were obtained: cowpea (UICH/004/1491/2022), soya bean (UILH/003/1490/2022), sorghum (UILH/002/1489/2022), sesame (UILH/005/1492/2022), and okra (UILH/001/ 1488/2022).

Seeds were surface-sterilized in solution of 5% sodium hypochlorite (v/v) for 5 min and viability-tested before use. The surface-sterilized seeds were then washed three times in sterile distilled water.

For preliminary viability testing, approximately 500 seeds were soaked in a 500-mL beaker containing distilled water. Floated seeds were considered non-viable and discarded. Further viability was ascertained by planting seeds (100 seeds in triplicates) that passed the preliminary test in transparent plastic containers (80 cm in diameter and 40 cm depth) containing 3.5 g absorbent cotton wool as blotters and incubated for five days. Only seed lots with a minimum of 70% average germination (60% for okra) were considered viable and used for the study.

2.3. Germinability and Growth Promotion Studies

For the determination of optimal steeping duration, the respective seeds were steeped in 48-hour broth cultures of the respective test bacterial species and allowed to stand. Seven seeds primed in the respective inoculum were withdrawn every 1 h for a 5 h duration, sown in respective plastic cups and incubated at 25 oC ± 2 oC under fluorescent light for 8 d to assess germinability and growth parameters. In the case of inoculum concentration, the seeds were primed in different dilutions of cultures, expressed as water/broth culture ratios. The water/broth culture ratios used for the study were 4:1, 3:2, 2:3, 1:4, and 0:5. The steeping duration used in the second experiment (concentration) was the optimal steeping duration obtained in the first experiment (steeping duration), i.e., the lowest steeping duration that gave the best significant vigor index value. Following steeping, the respective seeds were planted, as described earlier. For both experiments, the following parameters were calculated and recorded.

Final germination percentage (FGP), mean germination time (MGT), germination index (GIX) and vigor index (VIX) were estimated thus:

  • Final germination % (FGP) = total number of germinated seeds / total number of seeds sown x 100% [31]
  • Mean germination time (MGT) = [32]

Where f is the number of seeds germinated on day x

  • Germination index (GIX) = (8 × N1)+(7 × N2)+(6 × N3)+...+(1 × N8) [33]

Where N1, N2,N3...N8 represent the number of seeds that germinated on the first, second, and third until the 8th day, and 8, 9, 7…1 are the weights given to the number of germinated seeds on the first, second, and third day up to the 8th day.

  • Vigor index (VIX)= FGP × average plant height [34]

2.4. Molecular Characterization of Test Bacterial Species

Extraction of DNA was carried out using 48 h old cultures grown on single colonies on medium. To obtain pellets, the resulting cultures were centrifuged at 4600 g for 5 min. Extraction and purification of the bacterial DNA were carried out by suspending the pellets in 520 μL of TE buffer (10 mMTrisHCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). After suspension, 15 μl of 20% SDS and 3 μL of Proteinase K (20 mg/mL) were then added, and the mixture was incubated at 37 ºC for 1 h before adding 100 μL of 5 M NaCl and 80 μL of a 10% CTAB solution in 0.7 M NaCl and then vortexed. The suspension was then incubated for 10 min at 65 ºC and incubated on ice for 15 min, after which chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1) mix was added before incubation on ice for 5 min and centrifugation at 7200 g for 20 min. After centrifugation, the aqueous phase was then transferred to a new tube and isopropanol (1: 0.6) was added and DNA precipitated at –20 ºC for 16 h. DNA was collected by centrifugation at 13000g for 10 min. The resulting DNA was later washed with 500 μl of 70% ethanol, air-dried at room temperature for approximately three hours, and finally dissolved in 50 μl of TE buffer.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in a GeneAmp 9700 PCR System Thermal cycler (Applied Biosystem Inc., USA). Amplification of extracted DNA was carried out in a cocktail mixture that consisted of 10 µl of 5x GoTaq colourless reaction, 3 µl of 25mM MgCl2, 1 µl of 10 mM of dNTPs mix, 1 µl of 10 pmol each 27F 5’ AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG3’ and 1525R, 5′AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCC3′ primers and 0.3units of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, USA). The mixture was made up to 42 µl with sterile distilled water 8μl DNA template. Amplification during initial denaturation and enzyme activation took place at 94 °C for 5 min; which was followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50 °C for 60 s and extension at 72°C for 90 s; and final termination at 72 °C for 10 min and chilling at 4 °C GEL.

The integrity of the amplified about 1.5Mb gene fragment was checked on a 1% Agarose gel run to confirm amplification. To separate the base pairs, 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis in buffer (1XTAE buffer) was used. The sizes of the PCR products were estimated by comparing them to the mobility of a 100bp molecular weight ladder that was run in the gel alongside the experimental samples. Following gel integrity, the amplified fragments were purified using ethanol precipitation [35].

The amplified fragments were sequenced using an Applied Biosystems Genetic Analyzer 3130XL sequencer and the BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Bio Edit software and MEGA 6 were used for all genetic analyses. Sequences were deposited in the NCBI database, and ascension numbers were obtained.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All data were presented as means and standard deviations of triplicate analysis. Comparison of means was carried out using the One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, with multiple comparisons carried out using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test. All analyses were carried out at 95% confidence level.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Test Bacterial Species

Sequencing of the amplified PCR products of the bacterial isolates revealed three species of B. cereus and one of B. thuringiensis (Table 1).

Table 1.
Molecular identification data for the Bacillus species used in seed priming.
Isolate Code Scientific Name Max
Score
Total Score Query Cover E-value Percent Identity Accession
Number
A Bacillus cereus 1615 1615 98% 0 99.77% OP830500
B Bacillus cereus 1655 1655 100% 0 100.00% OP830493
C Bacillus cereus 1633 1633 99% 0 99.89% OP830502
D Bacillus thuringiensis 1626 1626 100% 0 99.66% OP830494
E Bacillus cereus 1635 1635 99% 0 99.78% OP830495

3.2. Effect of Priming Duration on Germinability of the Seeds

3.2.1. Final Germination

For the cowpea seeds, final germination did not differ significantly at the different steeping durations in the presence of isolates A and B. When seeds were primed in isolates C and D, 5 h and 1, 2, and 3 h steeping durations were observed to show significantly higher percent germination than seeds steeped at other durations, respectively. For seeds that were treated in isolate E, significantly higher final percent germination was observed for seeds that were steep-primed for either 2 or 4 h (Table 1). In the case of the soybean seeds, significantly higher final germination was observed at 1 and 3 h steeping durations for isolate A. For seeds steeped in isolates B and C, significantly higher germination was observed at 1 and 4 h and 1, 2, 4, and 5 h steeping durations, respectively. However, seeds steeped in isolate E did not show a significant difference in final germination at the respective steeping durations, while 1, 2, 3, and 4 h steeping durations were observed to show significantly higher final germination when seeds were treated with isolate D (Table 2).

Table 2.
Effect of steeping duration on the final germination percentage of the seeds.
- Time A B C D E
Cowpea 1 h 71.43a(±15.65) 78.57a(±7.82) 85.70ac(±0.00) 64.29ab(±7.82) 73.21a(±1.96)
2 h 78.57a(±7.82) 78.55a(±23.50) 78.57a(±7.82) 78.57b(±23.47) 92.86b(±7.82)
3 h 78.57a(±23.47) 57.14a(±15.65) 78.57a(±7.82) 64.29ab(±7.82) 64.29a(±7.82)
4 h 71.43a(±0.00) 71.43a(±15.65) 64.29b(±7.82) 57.14a(±15.65) 78.57ab(±23.47)
5 h 71.43a(±15.65) 64.30a(±23.44) 92.86c(±7.82) 71.43ab(±0.00) 42.86c(±15.65)
Soybean 1 h 71.43a(±0.00) 85.71a(±0.00) 64.25ab(±7.83) 64.29ac(±23.47) 52.68a(±10.76)
2 h 50.00b(±7.82) 64.29bc(±7.82) 64.29ab(±7.82) 71.43ab(±0.00) 71.43a(±0.00)
3 h 64.29a(±7.82) 57.14b(±15.65) 57.14a(±15.65) 85.71b(±15.65) 57.14a(±31.30)
4 h 50.00b(±7.82) 71.43ab(±15.65) 71.43b(±15.65) 85.71b(±15.65) 71.43a(±0.00)
5 h 50.00b(±7.82) 50.00c(±23.44) 64.29ab(±7.82) 71.43bc(±15.65) 57.14a(±15.65)
Sorghum 1 h 92.86ac(±7.82) 71.43a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 66.07a(±9.78)
2 h 100.00a(±0.00) 92.86b(±7.82) 100.00a(±0.00) 92.86b(±7.82) 100.00b(±0.00)
3 h 85.71bc(±15.65) 92.86b(±7.82) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 92.86b(±7.82)
4 h 92.86ab(±7.82) 100.00c(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 78.57c(±23.47)
5 h 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00c(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 92.86b(±7.82) 100.00b(±0.00)
Sesame 1 h 92.86a(±7.82) 92.86a(±7.82) 92.85a(±7.83) 64.29a(±7.82) 86.61a(±0.98)
2 h 100.00b(±0.00) 92.86a(±7.82) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00b(±0.00) 92.86b(±7.82)
3 h 100.00b(±0.00) 92.86a(±7.82) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00b(±0.00) 100.00c(±0.00)
4 h 92.86a(±7.82) 100.00a(±0.00) 71.43b(±0.00) 100.00b(±0.00) 92.86b(±7.82)
5 h 85.71c(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 78.57b(±23.47) 92.86c(±7.82) 100.00c(±0.00)
Okra 1 h 28.57ab(±15.65) 7.14a(±7.82) 7.15a(±7.83) 50.00a(±23.47) 20.54a(±8.80)
2 h 21.43b(±23.47) 42.86b(±15.65) 35.71b(±7.82) 50.00a(±23.47) 14.29a(±15.65)
3 h 28.57ab(±0.00) 21.43ab(±23.47) 35.71b(±7.82) 28.57ab(±15.65) 21.43a(±7.82)
4 h 28.57ab(±0.00) 21.43ab(±23.47) 28.57b(±15.65) 21.43b(±7.82) 42.86b(±15.65)
5 h 42.86a(±0.00) 42.85ab(±31.27) 35.71b(±7.82) 28.57ab(±15.65) 7.14a(±7.82)
Note: A, B, C, D, and E represent Bacillus cereus (OP830500), B. cereus OP830493 B. cereus (OP830502), B. thuringiensis (OP830494), and B. cereus (OP830495).

When the sorghum seeds were treated with the isolates, significantly higher final germinations were observed at 2 and 5 h and 4 and 5 h steeping durations for isolates A and B, respectively. However, no significant difference in final germination was observed at the respective steeping durations in the presence of isolate C. In the presence of isolates D and E, 1, 3, and 4 h steeping durations and 2, 3, and 5 h steeping durations were observed to show significantly higher final germination, respectively (Table 1). Final germination of sesame seeds showed significantly higher final germination at 2 and 3 h steeping durations when treated with isolate A, while no significant difference in final germination was observed at the different steeping times when treated with isolate B. When seeds were steep-primed in isolate C, significantly higher final germination was observed at 1, 2, and 3 h steeping durations. However, when the sesame seeds were treated with isolates D and E, significantly higher germinations were observed at 2-4 h and 3 and 5 h steeping durations, respectively (Table 2).

Also, when the okra seeds were treated with the respective isolates, significantly higher final germination was observed at 1, 3, 4, and 5 h and 4 h steeping durations in the presence of isolates A and E, respectively. In the presence of isolates B and C, final germination was observed to be significantly higher when seeds were steeped for 2, 3, 4 or 5 h, while a steeping duration of 1, 2, 3, and 5 h showed significantly higher final germination in the presence of isolate D (Table 2).

3.2.2. Mean Germination Time

With respect to mean germination time, significantly lower mean germination time was observed for cowpea seeds that were steeped before planting for 1-3 h in inoculum A, 1 and 3 h in inoculum B, and 1, 2, and 4 h in inoculum C. No significant difference in mean germination time was observed at the different steeping times for seeds treated in inoculum D. For seeds primed in isolate E, significantly lower mean germination times were observed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h steeping durations (Table 2). For the soybean seeds, significantly lower mean germination times were recorded at steeping durations of 1-3 and 5 h and 1, 2, 3, and 4 h and 1-4 h and 1-3 and 5 h and 1, 2, 4, and 5 h for seeds treated in inoculums A, B, C, D, and E, respectively (Table 3).

For the sorghum seeds, significantly lower mean germination time was observed for seeds steeped for 3 and 5 h in inoculum A. For seeds that were treated in inoculums B and D, significantly lower mean germination times were observed at 2-4 h and 2-5 h, while for seeds treated with inoculums C and E, significantly lower mean germination times were observed at 2, 3, and 5 h steeping times for both isolates (Table 3).

In the case of the sesame seeds, significantly lower mean germination times were observed at 1 and 3 h in seeds treated with inoculum A. For seed primed in inoculum B, significantly lower mean germination times were observed at the steeping duration of 2 h. In the case of inoculum C, significantly lower mean germination times were observed at steeping durations of 2 and 3 h. For inoculum D, 1, 2, and 4 h posted significantly lower mean germination times. For seeds steep-primed in inoculum E, significantly lower mean germination times were observed at 1 and 2 h. In the case of okra, significantly lower mean germination times of 2 h and 1, 2, 3, and 4 h and 1, 2, 3, and 5 h were observed for seeds steeped in isolates A, B, C, and E, respectively. In contrast, there was no significant difference between the mean germination times for the different steeping durations for seeds steeped in isolate D (Table 3).

3.2.3. Germination Index

At the different treatments, the germination index of the cowpea seeds showed significantly higher values at steeping durations of 1-3 h (inoculum A), 1-2 h (inoculum B), 1 and 5 h (inoculum C) and 1, 2, 3, and 5 h (inoculum D), and 1 and 2 h (inoculum E). For the soybean seeds, significantly higher germination index values were observed at steeping durations of 1 h (inoculum A), 1, 2, and 4 h (inoculum B), and 1, 2, 4, and 5 h (inoculum C). For seeds that were primed in inoculums D and E, there was no significant difference in the germination index of the soybean seeds at the respective steeping durations (Table 4).

Table 3.
Effect of steeping duration on the mean germination time of the seeds.
- Time A B C D E
Cowpea 1 h 5.29a(±0.20) 5.15a(±0.06) 5.23a(±0.00) 5.48a(±0.18) 5.52a(±0.07)
2 h 5.29a(±0.12) 5.60b(±0.55) 5.35a(±0.17) 5.53a(±0.18) 5.53a(±0.17)
3 h 5.31a(±0.22) 5.32ab(±0.02) 5.48b(±0.25) 5.50a(±0.20) 5.39a(±0.18)
4 h 5.57b(±0.11) 5.53b(±0.03) 5.26a(±0.03) 5.52a(±0.14) 5.56a(±0.11)
5 h 5.82c(±0.14) 5.49b(±0.05) 5.46b(±0.16) 5.65a(±0.17) 5.80b(±0.21)
Soybean 1 h 5.54a(±0.05) 5.75ab(±0.13) 5.54ab(±0.05) 5.63ab(±0.14) 5.54a(±0.05)
2 h 5.61ab(±0.12) 5.67ac(±0.23) 5.55a(±0.10) 5.55a(±0.04) 5.50a(±0.00)
3 h 5.52a(±0.07) 5.82ad(±0.35) 5.57a(±0.08) 5.57a(±0.07) 6.00b(±0.55)
4 h 5.75bc(±0.27) 5.61a(±0.12) 5.57a(±0.08) 5.79b(±0.32) 5.50a(±0.00)
5 h 5.61ac(±0.04) 5.88bcd(±0.13) 5.69b(±0.09) 5.59a(±0.02) 5.57a(±0.08)
Sorghum 1 h 5.37a(±0.18) 5.49a(±0.03) 5.33a(±0.07) 5.32a(±0.09) 5.27ac(±0.21)
2 h 5.36a(±0.04) 5.13bc(±0.07) 5.10b(±0.04) 5.11b(±0.12) 5.12b(±0.01)
3 h 5.28ab(±0.09) 5.10b(±0.11) 5.12b(±0.13) 5.26ab (±0.21) 5.08b(±0.03)
4 h 5.40a(±0.02) 5.13b(±0.07) 5.33a(±0.07) 5.20ab(±0.08) 5.35a(±0.12)
5 h 5.17b(±0.19) 5.23c(±0.12) 5.19b(±0.06) 5.24ab(±0.10) 5.15bc(±0.03)
Sesame 1 h 5.27a(±0.05) 5.37a(±0.15) 5.33a(±0.01) 5.35ab(±0.13) 5.17a(±0.11)
2 h 5.37bc(±0.11) 5.12b(±0.13) 5.27b(±0.08) 5.29ac(±0.03) 5.21ab(±0.06)
3 h 5.31ab(±0.12) 5.25c(±0.02) 5.27b(±0.00) 5.38bc(±0.12) 5.30bc(±0.11)
4 h 5.41cd(±0.01) 5.30ac(±0.04) 5.43c(±0.04) 5.27a(±0.00) 5.37c(±0.06)
5 h 5.50d(±0.00) 5.38a(±0.04) 5.50d(±0.00) 5.54c(±0.04) 5.50d(±0.00)
Okra 1 h 5.41a(±0.10) 2.75a(±3.01) 2.50a(±2.74) 5.34a(±0.28) 5.70ab(±0.22)
2 h 3.00b(±3.29) 5.10ab(±0.11) 5.08b(±0.08) 5.33a(±0.37) 3.00a(±3.29)
3 h 5.25a(±0.27) 2.63a(±2.88) 5.40b(±0.44) 5.22a(±0.24) 5.25ab(±0.27)
4 h 5.00a(±0.00) 3.25ac(±3.56) 6.26b(±0.81) 5.55a(±0.05) 6.02b(±0.57)
5 h 5.64a(±0.31) 5.94bc(±0.61) 5.08b(±0.09) 5.50a(±0.55) 3.50ab(±3.83)
Note: A, B, C, D, and E represent Bacillus cereus (OP830500), B. cereus OP830493 B. cereus (OP830502), B. thuringiensis (OP830494), and B. cereus (OP830495).
Table 4.
Effect of steeping duration on the germination index of the seeds.
- Time A B C D E
Cowpea 1 h 116.00ac(±12.05) 140.50ac(±8.22) 147.00a(±0.00) 93.00ab(±1.10) 111.50ab(±13.69)
2 h 129.50a(±3.83) 114.50ab(±73.94) 118.50b(±0.55) 110.00b(±20.81) 130.00a(±4.38)
3 h 124.00a(±20.81) 88.50b(±24.65) 104.50b(±16.98) 92.50ab(±0.55) 99.00b(±1.10)
4 h 98.00bc(±8.76) 97.00bc(±14.24) 108.50b(±11.50) 84.50a(±30.12) 106.00b(±23.00)
5 h 83.50b(±24.65) 91.00b(±29.58) 137.00a(±27.39) 94.00ab(±12.05) 52.50c(±27.93)
Soybean 1 h 102.00a(±3.29) 102.50ac(±9.31) 91.50ab(±s8.22) 89.00a(±40.53) 81.00a(±19.72)
2 h 66.00b(±3.29) 83.00ab(±2.19) 89.50ab(±4.93) 100.00a(±1.10) 105.00a(±0.00)
3 h 92.00c(±7.67) 75.50bd(±16.98) 81.00a(±26.29) 120.00a(±16.43) 73.00a(±58.06)
4 h 60.00b(±3.29) 96.00a(±13.15) 99.00b(±16.43) 108.50a(±42.17) 105.00a(±0.00)
5 h 68.00b(±12.05) 57.00cd(±29.58) 82.50ab(±4.93) 99.00a(±23.00) 81.00a(±26.29)
Sorghum 1 h 143.50a(±4.93) 103.50a(±2.74) 161.50a(±7.12) 160.00ac(±9.86) 123.00a(±41.63)
2 h 158.50ab(±3.83) 168.00bd(±7.67) 185.50b(±3.83) 169.00ab(±1.10) 182.50b(±0.55)
3 h 144.00a(±33.96) 171.50be(±3.83) 182.50b(±14.79) 169.00b(±21.91) 172.50b(±11.50)
4 h 144.00a(±10.95) 182.00c(±7.67) 161.50a(±7.12) 175.00bc(±7.67) 127.00a(±46.01)
5 h 178.50b(±19.17) 171.50de(±11.50) 175.50b(±7.12) 156.00bd(±2.19) 179.00b(±3.29)
Sesame 1 h 154.50ab(±8.22) 147.00ac(±0.00) 150.50a(±11.50) 102.00a(±4.38) 164.50a(±3.83)
2 h 158.00a(±10.95) 171.50b(±26.84) 168.00a(±7.67) 165.00b(±3.29) 161.00a(±7.67)
3 h 164.50a(±11.50) 157.50ab(±11.50) 168.00a(±0.00) 158.00b(±10.95) 165.00a(±10.95)
4 h 143.50b(±11.50) 164.50b(±3.83) 109.00b(±3.29) 168.00b(±0.00) 147.00b(±7.67)
5 h 126.00c(±0.00) 157.50bc(±3.83) 115.50b(±34.51) 133.50c(±14.79) 147.00b(±0.00)
Okra 1 h 45.50a(±26.84) 10.50a(±11.50) 14.00a(±15.34) 83.50a(±54.22) 26.00a(±5.48)
2 h 22.50b(±24.65) 77.50b(±23.55) 66.50b(±11.50) 73.00ac(±18.62) 13.50b(±14.79)
3 h 49.00a(±7.67) 35.50ac(±38.89) 52.00bc(±4.38) 46.00bc(±19.72) 35.00ac(±7.67)
4 h 56.00a(±0.00) 15.00a(±16.43) 32.50ac(±29.03) 27.50b(±7.12) 39.50c(±2.74)
5 h 51.00a(±12.05) 57.50bc(±52.03) 65.00b(±20.81) 35.00b(±7.67) 3.00d(±3.29)
Note: A, B, C, D, and E represent Bacillus cereus (OP830500), B. cereus OP830493 B. cereus (OP830502), B. thuringiensis (OP830494), and B. cereus (OP830495).
Table 5.
Effect of steeping duration on the vigor index of the seedlings.
- Time A B C D E
Cowpea 1 h 1065.71a(±254.41 1146.73a(±91.88) 1209.80ac(±210.59 649.29a(±163.98 883.34a(±190.78)
2 h 1286.22a(±328.07 1121.02a(±897.15 1079.90ab(±5.25) 676.94a(±382.06 1251.63b(±134.36)
3 h 1093.47a(±523.58 357.96b(±69.53) 1028.88ab(±49.97) 705.00a(±194.61 478.67cd(±60.25)
4 h 658.67b(±38.56) 775.31ab(±139.28 823.06b(±164.76 664.90a(±341.38 715.10ac(±330.87)
5 h 592.45b(±162.53 713.57ab(±518.10 1526.63c(±585.84 818.37a(±421.41 249.59d(±233.62)
Soybean 1 h 807.14a(±247.03 686.94a(±130.11 847.35a(±135.92 755.82ab(±498.65) 419.32ac(±191.07)
2 h 295.41b(±119.05 249.18b(±104.85 338.16b(±29.73) 672.96b(±67.63) 890.31bd(±82.16)
3 h 420.10b(±256.31 288.47b(±85.29) 396.94b(±260.45 1175.82a(±56.23) 662.45abc(±641.17)
4 h 270.31b(±114.35 527.96a(±90.99) 414.90b(±88.75) 1132.65a(±605.85 793.88ab(±263.80)
5 h 285.82b(±94.01) 326.22b(±238.43 476.53b(±90.54) 742.45c(±160.52 356.63c(±159.29)
Sorghum 1 h 932.45a(±255.53 437.24a(±77.69) 1252.14a(±197.96 1223.57a(±35.21) 501.38a(±349.82)
2 h 910.00a(±17.21) 1013.06b(±370.66 1092.14b(±21.13) 1039.18b(±235.63 1215.00b(±75.90)
3 h 738.17a(±211.71 732.86c(±164.32 1180.71a(±127.54 921.43bc(±29.73) 897.76cd(±127.65)
4 h 899.08a(±259.22 787.86bc(±138.50 1027.14c(±39.12) 916.43bc(±7.04) 642.55ac(±396.26)
5 h 932.14a(±258.99 852.14bc(±66.51) 905.71d(±23.47) 798.37c(±195.84 1162.14bd(±82.16)
Sesame 1 h 461.94a(±33.87) 467.96a(±44.49) 544.80a(±40.13) 243.06a(±17.66) 478.34ac(±20.99)
2 h 469.29a(±2.35) 513.78a(±171.14 499.29a(±11.74) 520.00b(±14.08) 634.90b(±112.00)
3 h 443.57a(±58.68) 448.78a(±6.04) 519.29a(±2.35) 511.43b(±7.82) 576.43ab(±41.47)
4 h 379.69b(±83.28) 519.29a(±25.82) 256.12b(±10.06) 529.29b(±27.39) 556.12ab(±126.31)
5 h 297.55c(±37.56) 322.14b(±7.04) 282.45b(±166.33 354.08c(±0.22) 450.00c(±78.25)
Okra 1 h 67.04ab(±43.26) 10.51ad(±11.51) 14.90a(±16.32) 356.73a(±331.32 37.19ab(±16.49)
2 h 53.88a(±59.02) 185.92b(±146.88 160.10b(±72.10) 228.98ab(±135.92 17.76ad(±19.45)
3 h 79.80ab(±6.93) 72.86abc(±79.81) 158.37b(±66.62) 96.22b(±56.90) 56.84b(±42.81)
4 h 64.08ab(±5.37) 43.47ac(±47.62) 104.69b(±110.66 37.24b(±10.62) 125.51c(±45.83)
5 h 96.12b(±14.08) 164.90bc(±170.35 91.12ab(±44.38) 102.45b(±86.96) 0.51d(±0.56)
Note: A, B, C, D, and E represent Bacillus cereus (OP830500), B. cereus OP830493 B. cereus (OP830502), B. thuringiensis (OP830494), and B. cereus (OP830495).

In the case of the sorghum seeds, significantly higher germination index values were observed at 2 and 5 h and 4 h in seeds steeped in inoculums A and B, respectively, while for those steeped in inoculums C and E, significantly higher germination index values were observed at steeping durations of 2 and 3 h and 2, 3 and 5 h, respectively. For inoculum D steeped seeds, 1 and 4 h steeping durations showed significantly higher germination index. Furthermore, the germination index of the sesame seeds showed significantly higher values at steeping times of 1-3 h (inoculum A), 2-5 h (inoculum B), 1-3 h (inoculum C), 2-4 h (inoculum D), and 1-3 h (inoculum E). For the okra seeds, significantly lower germination index values were observed at 2 and 5 h in the presence of inoculums A and E, respectively. However, significantly higher germination index values were observed at 2 and 5 h (inoculum B), 2, 3, and 5 h (inoculum C), and 1 and 2 h (inoculum D) (Table 4).

3.2.4. Vigor Index

As shown in Table 4, significantly higher vigor index values were observed in cowpea seeds that were steeped between 1-3 h and 1, 2, 4, and 5 h and 1 and 5 h and 2 h in inoculums A, B, C and E, respectively. No significant difference in vigor index values was observed for seeds steeped in inoculum D. For the soybean seeds, 1 h, 1 and 4 h, and 1 h durations showed significantly higher vigor index when treated in inoculums A, B and C, respectively. In the case of soybean seeds steeped in inoculums D and E, a significantly higher vigor index was observed at steeping periods of 1, 3, and 4 h for both isolates. In the case of the sorghum seeds, no significant difference in vigor index was observed for seeds steeped in inoculum A at the respective durations. For seeds treated with inoculums B, C, D and E, 2, 4, and 5 h, 2 h, 2, 3, and 4 h, and 2 and 4 h steeping durations were observed to have significantly higher vigor index values, respectively. Vigor index of the sesame seeds showed a significantly higher vigor index at steeping durations of 1-3 h, 1-4 h, 1-3 h, 2-4 h, and 2-4 h when treated with inoculums A, B, C, D and E, respectively. With respect to the okra seeds, significantly higher vigor index values were observed at steeping durations of 1, 3-5 h, 2, 3 and 5 h, 2-5 h, 1 and 2 h, and 4 h for seeds treated in inoculums A, B, C, D and E, respectively (Table 5).

3.3. Effect of Initial Inoculum Concentration on Final Germination of the Seeds

For the isolate-treated cowpea seeds, final germination was not observed to be concentration-dependent. However, significantly higher final germinations were observed at initial inoculum concentrations of 3:2 and 4:1, 3:2, 2:3, and 1:4 and 4:1 and 3:2, 1:4, and 0:5 and 4:1, 3:2, 2:3, and 1:4 when inoculums A, B, C, D, and E were used for priming, respectively (Table 6). In the case of the soybean seeds, no significant difference in final germination was observed in the presence of inoculum C at the different concentrations. However, significantly higher final germination was observed when 3:2, 2:3, 1:4, and 0:5 dilutions of inoculum A were used. The 0:5 dilution of inoculum D gave significantly higher final germination. For inoculums E and B, 2:3 dilutions and 3:2, 2:3, and 1:4 dilutions produced significantly higher final germination (Table 6).

Also, the final germination of the sorghum and sesame seeds was observed to be remarkable at the respective inoculum concentrations used. This observation was irrespective of the bacterial isolate. Generally, germination of over 80% was observed for seeds at the respective treatments. For the okra seeds, significantly higher final germination was observed at inoculum concentrations of 3:2 and 0:5 dilutions, 4:1, 2:3, and 1:4 dilutions, 1:4 dilution, 3:2, 2:3, 1:4, and 0:5 dilutions, 4:1, 2:3, and 0:5 dilutions, when A, B, C, D, and E, respectively, were used for treatment (Table 6).

Table 6.
Effect of inoculum concentration on the final germination percentage of the seeds.
- - A B C D E
Cowpea C1 50.00ac(±7.78) 85.71a(±15.65) 92.86a(±7.82) 64.29a(±7.82) 57.14a(±15.65)
C2 64.29b(±7.82) 78.57ab(±7.82) 64.29b(±7.82) 71.43ab(±15.65) 57.14a(±15.65)
C3 57.14a(±15.65) 92.86a(±7.82) 64.29b(±7.82) 57.14a(±15.65) 57.14a(±15.65)
C4 42.86c(±15.65) 85.71a(±15.65) 64.29b(±39.12) 85.71b(±0.00) 50.00a(±7.82)
C5 50.00a(±7.82) 64.29b(±23.47) 57.14b(±15.65) 71.43ab(±31.30) 14.29b(±15.65)
Soybean C1 21.45a(±7.83) 64.29a(±7.82) 57.14a(±31.30) 78.57a(±7.82) 57.14a(±0.00)
C2 57.14b(±15.65) 85.71b(±0.00) 57.14a(±15.65) 50.00b(±7.82) 71.43b(±0.00)
C3 57.14b(±31.30) 85.71b(±0.00) 50.00a(±7.82) 78.57a(±7.82) 92.86c(±7.82)
C4 42.86b(±0.00) 92.86b(±7.82) 50.00a(±23.47) 78.57a±7.82) 57.14a(±0.00)
C5 57.14b(±15.65) 42.86c(±15.65) 57.14a(±0.00) 92.86c(±7.82) 64.29d(±7.82)
Sorghum C1 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 92.86a(±7.82)
C2 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00b(±0.00)
C3 100.00a(±0.00) 92.86b(±7.82) 85.71b±15.65) 92.86b(±7.82) 92.86a(±7.82)
C4 100.00a(±0.00) 92.86b(±7.82) 92.86ab(±7.82) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00b(±0.00)
C5 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00b(±0.00)
Sesame C1 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00)
C2 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00)
C3 100.00a(±0.00) 92.86b(±7.82) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00)
C4 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00)
C5 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00) 92.86b(±7.82) 100.00a(±0.00) 100.00a(±0.00)
Okra C1 28.60a(±0.00) 85.71a(±15.65) 50.00a(±7.82) 57.14a(±15.65) 78.57a(±7.82)
C2 92.86b(±7.82) 64.29bc(±7.82) 57.14a(±0.00) 85.71b(±0.00) 7.14b(±7.82)
C3 78.57c(±23.47) 78.57ab(±7.82) 35.71b(±23.47) 85.71b(±15.65) 64.29ac(±7.82)
C4 64.29d(±7.82) 78.57ab(±7.82) 92.86c(±7.82) 85.71b(±0.00) 57.14c(±15.65)
C5 85.71b(±0.00) 57.14c(±31.30) 57.14a(±0.00) 85.71b(±0.00) 71.43ac(±31.30)
Note: C1, C2, C3, C4, and C5 represent water/inoculum ratios of 4:1, 3:2, 2:3, 1:4 and 0:5, respectively. A, B, C, D, and E represent Bacillus cereus (OP830500), B. cereus OP830493 B. cereus (OP830502), B. thuringiensis (OP830494), and B. cereus (OP830495).
Table 7.
Effect of inoculum concentration on the mean germination time of the seeds.
- - A B C D E
Cowpea C1 5.39a(±0.08) 5.41a(±0.00) 5.21a(±0.02) 5.27a(±0.04) 5.31a(±0.17)
C2 5.36a(±0.19) 5.19b(±0.01) 5.37b(±0.01) 5.21b(±0.02) 5.20a(±0.05)
C3 5.30a(±0.02) 5.25bc(±0.08) 5.37b(±0.01) 5.50c(±0.03) 5.12a(±0.03)
C4 5.34a(±0.12) 5.32ac(±0.15) 5.38b(±0.04) 5.26a(±0.03) 5.35a(±0.03)
C5 5.34a(±0.02) 5.35a(±0.03) 5.47b(±0.24) 5.21b(±0.06) 2.50b(±2.74)
Soybean C1 5.36a(±0.40) 5.37ab(±0.01) 5.30a(±0.08) 5.26a(±0.03) 5.34a(±0.12)
C2 5.56ab(±0.27) 5.32b(±0.00) 5.40a(±0.05) 5.32b(±0.06) 5.33a(±0.06)
C3 5.41ac(±0.20) 5.20c(±0.14) 5.37a(±0.12) 5.12c(±0.03) 5.18b(±0.06)
C4 5.32a(±0.00) 5.42a(±0.09) 5.23a(±0.26) 5.21a(±0.03) 5.36a(±0.00)
C5 5.66bc(±0.02) 5.43a(±0.08) 5.73b(±0.14) 5.37b(±0.06) 5.41a(±0.06)
Sorghum C1 5.03a(±0.03) 5.10a(±0.04) 5.13a(±0.00) 5.10ab(±0.04) 5.00a(±0.00)
C2 5.08a(±0.03) 5.06ab(±0.07) 5.06b(±0.00) 5.03a(±0.03) 5.12b(±0.06)
C3 5.16b(±0.04) 5.03b(±0.03) 5.03b(±0.03) 5.07ab(±0.01) 5.06c(±0.07)
C4 5.10bc(±0.11) 5.07ab(±0.01) 5.03b(±0.03) 5.14b(±0.15) 5.06c(±0.00)
C5 5.06ac(±0.00) 5.16c(±0.04) 5.10c(±0.04) 5.10ab(±0.04) 5.06c(±0.00)
Sesame C1 5.27a(±0.08) 5.27a(±0.00) 5.34a(±0.00) 5.36a(±0.25) 5.27a(±0.08)
C2 5.27a(±0.00) 5.27a(±0.08) 5.27b(±0.08) 5.27a(±0.08) 5.30a(±0.04)
C3 5.27a(±0.08) 5.38b(±0.04) 5.34a(±0.08) 5.30a(±0.04) 4.99b(±0.16)
C4 5.20a(±0.08) 5.37b(±0.03) 5.27b(±0.00) 5.30a(±0.04) 5.27a(±0.08)
C5 5.31a(±0.13) 5.30a(±0.04) 5.29ab(±0.03) 5.30a(±0.04) 5.23a(±0.12)
Okra C1 5.62a(±0.42) 5.08a(±0.08) 5.24ab(±0.09) 5.44a(±0.01) 5.19a(±0.11)
C2 5.33bc(±0.03) 5.34b(±0.02) 5.33a(±0.15) 5.35b(±0.00) 3.00b(±3.29)
C3 5.50ab(±0.02) 5.32b(±0.07) 5.16b(±0.18) 5.16c(±0.01) 5.47a(±0.31)
C4 5.38abd(±0.25) 5.38b(±0.07) 5.23ab(±0.13) 5.36b(±0.01) 5.31a(±0.05)
C5 5.18cd(±0.19) 5.49c(±0.02) 5.34a(±0.12) 5.17c(±0.04) 5.36a(±0.23)
Note: C1, C2, C3, C4, and C5 represent water/inoculum ratios of 4:1, 3:2, 2:3, 1:4 and 0:5, respectively. A, B, C, D, and E represent Bacillus cereus (OP830500), B. cereus OP830493 B. cereus (OP830502), B. thuringiensis (OP830494), and B. cereus (OP830495).

Generally, the mean germination time of the seeds at the different concentrations of inoculums did not follow any visible trend. However, in the presence of inoculum A, no significant difference in the mean germination time of cowpea and sesame seeds was observed at the different initial inoculum concentrations. For soybean seeds, significantly lower mean germination times were observed at 2:3 dilution for inoculums B, D, and E. In the presence of inoculums A and D, no significant difference in the mean germination time of sesame seeds was observed at the different inoculums (Table 7).

The germination index of the seeds in the presence of inoculum A showed significantly higher values at inoculum dilutions of 3:2, 2:3, and 0:5 dilutions and 3:2, 2:3, 1:4, and 0:5 dilutions, for cowpea and sorghum seeds, respectively. Also, in the presence of inoculum C, significantly higher germination index values were observed at dilutions of 4:1 for cowpea seeds and 1:4 for okra seeds; however, there was no significant difference in germination index across the respective dilutions for soybean seeds. Seeds treated in inoculum D showed significantly higher germination index at dilutions of 3:2, 1:4, and 0:5 and 4:1, 3:2, 1:4, and 0:5 for cowpea and sorghum seeds, respectively, and significantly higher values were recorded at dilutions of 2:3, 1:4, and 0:5 and 3:2, 2:3, 1:4, and 0:5 for soybean and okra seeds, respectively. In addition, a significantly lower germination index was recorded for cowpea and okra seeds at dilutions of 0:5 and 3:2 for inoculum E. For seeds treated in inoculum B, a significantly higher germination index showed significantly higher values for cowpea and sesame seeds at dilutions of 3:2 and 2:3 for cowpea, 4:1, 3:2, and 0:5 for sesame seeds, and 4:1 for okra seeds (Table 8).

Table 8.
Effect of inoculum concentration on the germination index of the seeds.
- - A B C D E
Cowpea C1 77.50ac(±8.22) 125.50ac(±23.55) 161.00a(±15.34) 104.50ab(±7.12) 91.50a(±15.88)
C2 98.00b(±1.10) 137.00ab(±12.05) 101.50b(±11.50) 123.00ac(±26.29) 98.50a(±23.55)
C3 94.50ab(±26.84) 158.00b(±19.72) 101.50b(±11.50) 82.50b(±25.74) 105.00a(±30.67)
C4 67.00c(±19.72) 132.00a(±6.57) 100.00b(±62.44) 144.00c(±3.29) 78.50a(±9.31)
C5 80.50abc(±11.50) 102.00c(±35.05) 86.50b(±36.70) 122.50ac(±49.84) 28.00b(±30.67)
Soybean C1 32.00a(±4.38) 101.50a(±11.50) 91.50a(±46.56) 133.00a(±15.34) 91.50a(±7.12)
C2 76.50b(±7.12) 140.00b(±0.00) 88.50a(±26.84) 79.00b(±8.76) 115.50b(±3.83)
C3 82.50b(±36.70) 150.50b(±11.50) 76.00a(±5.48) 143.50ac(±11.50) 164.50c(±19.17)
C4 70.00b(±0.00) 143.50b(±19.17) 81.00a(±27.39) 136.50ac(±11.50) 91.00a(±0.00)
C5 75.00b(±19.72) 66.50c(±26.84) 72.00a(±6.57) 147.00c(±7.67) 98.50a(±8.22)
Sorghum C1 192.50a(±3.83) 185.50ab(±3.83) 180.00ab(±2.19) 185.50ab(±3.83) 182.00ab(±15.34)
C2 186.00ac(±3.29) 189.00a(±7.67) 189.00a(±0.00) 192.50a(±3.83) 182.50ab(±7.12)
C3 178.50b(±3.83) 178.50ab(±11.50) 164.50bc(±26.84) 175.00b(±15.34) 175.00a(±7.67)
C4 185.50cd(±11.50) 175.00b(±15.34) 178.50ac(±11.50) 180.00a(±17.53) 189.00b(±0.00)
C5 189.00ad(±0.00) 176.50b(±6.02) 185.50a(±3.83) 183.50ab(±6.02) 189.00b(±0.00)
Sesame C1 168.00ab(±7.67) 168.00a(±0.00) 161.00ab(±0.00) 157.50a(±26.84) 168.00a(±7.67)
C2 168.00ab(±0.00) 168.00a(±7.67) 168.00a(±7.67) 168.00a(±7.67) 164.50a(±3.83)
C3 168.00ab(±7.67) 147.00b(±15.34) 161.00ab(±7.67) 164.50a(±3.83) 197.00b(±16.43)
C4 175.00a(±7.67) 156.00bc(±1.10) 168.00a(±0.00) 164.50a(±3.83) 168.00a(±7.67)
C5 162.50b(±13.69) 164.50ac(±3.83) 154.00b(±15.34) 164.50a(±3.83) 171.50a(±11.50)
Okra C1 39.50a(±10.41) 161.50a(±37.79) 84.50a(±8.22) 85.50a(±23.55) 137.00ac(±4.38)
C2 149.00b(±15.34) 102.50bc(±11.50) 92.00a(±7.67) 135.00b(±0.00) 7.50b(±8.22)
C3 112.00c(±33.96) 127.00b(±7.67) 60.00b(±35.05) 151.50b(±26.84) 181.00c(±89.83)
C4 102.50c(±26.84) 121.00b(±7.67) 159.00c(±26.29) 134.50b(±0.55) 92.00a(±23.00)
C5 151.50b(±18.07) 84.50c(±46.56) 91.50a(±7.12) 151.50b(±3.83) 107.00a(±32.86)
Note: C1, C2, C3, C4, and C5 represent water/inoculum ratios of 4:1, 3:2, 2:3, 1:4 and 0:5, respectively. A, B, C, D, and E represent Bacillus cereus (OP830500), B. cereus OP830493 B. cereus (OP830502), B. thuringiensis (OP830494), and B. cereus (OP830495).
Table 9.
Effect of inoculum concentration on the vigor index of the seedlings.
- - A B C D E
Cowpea C1 245.71a(±172.59) 756.84ab(±283.59) 979.08a(±46.39) 435.10a(±153.81) 296.63a(±174.71)
C2 494.59b(±6.37) 900.41ac(±400.62) 588.57ab(±119.83) 705.31a(±568.74) 285.92a(±156.27)
C3 395.41ab(±288.95) 1106.84a(±81.71) 595.82ab(±5.48) 352.65a(±297.78) 448.06a(±167.56)
C4 248.37a(±158.06) 1091.33a(±314.66) 761.53ab(±757.31) 675.92a(±91.21) 331.02a(±198.97)
C5 368.27ab(±47.28) 569.08bc(±430.91) 396.84b(±291.86) 730.51a(±600.37) 49.18b(±53.88)
Soybean C1 19.90a(±18.44) 720.82a(±149.34) 397.96a(±289.73) 962.86a(±133.69) 413.88a(±4.47)
C2 406.43b(±253.41) 1149.80b(±76.46) 360.71a(±220.77) 317.65b(±10.62) 924.49b(±21.24)
C3 292.45b(±212.16) 1275.31bc(±114.7) 350.61a(±32.64) 1107.76a(±196.29) 1460.61c(±453.16)
C4 180.92ab(±90.21) 1458.57c(±339.59) 333.06a(±216.41) 1025.61a(±105.19) 617.14ad(±17.88)
C5 379.69b(±263.69) 152.24d(±123.85) 297.55a(±73.77) 1604.39c(±228.37) 720.82bd(±149.34)
Sorghum C1 881.43a(±98.59) 973.57a(±75.90) 643.57a(±97.81) 884.29a(±92.33) 765.31a(±147.55)
C2 829.29a(±110.33) 887.86a(±13.30) 921.43b(±219.09) 774.29a(±104.85) 930.71b(±47.73)
C3 615.71b(±156.49) 992.55a(±106.75) 754.49ab(±420.74) 648.37b(±87.86) 890.51b(±43.26)
C4 837.14a(±40.69) 925.20a(±114.80) 714.69ab(±93.45) 776.43a(±125.98) 766.43a(±14.87)
C5 1030.71c(±24.26) 966.43a(±269.95) 927.14b(±133.02) 849.29a(±107.20) 763.57a(±55.55)
Sesame C1 484.29a(±37.56) 682.86a(±15.65) 573.57a(±55.55) 590.71a(±24.26) 585.00a(±33.65)
C2 522.86a(±34.43) 589.29b(±79.03) 620.00ab(±7.82) 668.57a(±129.89) 575.71a(±62.60)
C3 527.14a(±9.39) 539.59b(±41.14) 686.43b(±135.37) 617.14a(±20.34) 563.57a(±3.91)
C4 700.00b(±75.12) 661.43ac(±23.47) 680.00b(±68.86) 657.86a(±2.35) 509.29b(±39.91)
C5 544.29a(±84.51) 613.57c(±22.69) 569.59a(±27.05) 632.14a(±68.07) 548.57ab(±50.08)
Okra C1 54.49a(±9.17) 811.53a(±290.96) 162.35a(±5.48) 306.53a(±139.28) 594.90a(±79.36)
C2 704.59b(±62.26) 437.24b(±174.94) 284.90a(±86.74) 596.94b(±32.86) 102.20b(±0.22)
C3 468.57c(±118.93) 547.86ab(±122.85) 163.47a(±158.06) 684.69b(±220.21) 428.98ac(±57.68)
C4 346.33d(±154.93) 511.94b(±132.68) 875.10b(±349.65) 435.31a(±79.81) 281.22c(±169.24)
C5 683.88b(±26.16) 370.20b(±350.99) 254.29a(±48.74) 584.08b(±53.65) 375.10c(±318.35)
Note: C1, C2, C3, C4, and C5 represent water/inoculum ratios of 4:1, 3:2, 2:3, 1:4 and 0:5, respectively. A, B, C, D, and E represent Bacillus cereus (OP830500), B. cereus OP830493 B. cereus (OP830502), B. thuringiensis (OP830494), and B. cereus (OP830495).

With respect to the vigor index of the seeds, no consistent pattern of increase or decrease was observed with a concentration of inoculum. In the presence of inoculum A, significantly higher vigor index values were observed at inoculum dilutions of 3:2, 2:3, and 0:5, 4:1, 3:2, and 1:4, and 1:4, for cowpea, sorghum and sesame seeds, respectively, while significantly lower values were recorded at dilution of 4:1 for soybean and okra seeds (Table 9).

For inoculum C-treated seeds, vigor index showed significantly lower values at inoculum concentrations of 0:5 and 4:1 for cowpea and sorghum seeds, respectively, while significantly higher values were recorded at dilution of 3:2, 2:3, and 1:4 and 1:4 for sesame and okra seeds, respectively. In seeds treated in inoculum D, vigor index values of cowpea and sesame seeds showed no significant difference across the respective dilutions, while significantly higher values were recorded at dilutions of 0:5 and 4:1, 3:2, 1:4, and 0:5, for soybean and sorghum seeds, respectively. For the inoculums B-treated seeds, no significant difference in vigor was observed for sorghum seeds at the respective concentrations. However, for cowpea, soybean, sesame, and okra seeds treated with inoculum B, significantly higher vigor index values were obtained at dilutions of 4:1, 3:2, 2:3, and 1:4, 2:3 and 1:4, 4:1 and 1:4, and 4:1 and 2:3, respectively. For soybean, sorghum, sesame seeds, and okra seeds, significantly higher vigor index values were observed when treated in dilutions of 2:3 and 3:2 and 2:3 and 4:1, 3:2, 2:3, 0:5 and 4:1 and 2:3, for inoculum E, respectively, while significantly lower values were observed for cowpea in dilution of 0:5 (Table 9).

4. DISCUSSION

The bacterial species used in this study were previously identified as plant growth promoters. The essence of this study was to determine the impact of varying steeping duration and concentration on their growth promotion activity vis-à-vis some agronomic parameters. Final germination represents the number of seeds that germinated, expressed as a percentage of seeds planted. A higher FGP signifies that a large number of seeds germinated [36]. Proper seed germination is a fundamental process in a life cycle of a plant, and it is directly linked to plant productivity [37, 38]. In this study, there was no consistent relationship between steeping duration and final germination across all the crops for the isolates. Most of the time, a higher value at a shorter steeping duration was also found to be statistically similar to values obtained at longer steeping durations. Nevertheless, in this study, for cowpea and soybean, longer steeping durations tended to post lower final percent germination due to over-imbibition, which resulted in sogginess of the seeds, and hence, impeded germination. Therefore, while longer steeping durations can provide more time for further bacterial attachment to the seed surface, which may prove beneficial down the line after seeds are sown, there is the risk of over-imbibition when seeds (such as cowpea and soybean) with large hydrophilic endosperms are sown directly without drying. Again, a high bacterial population on seed, which is possible with a longer steeping period, can reduce seed energy efficiency since more bacteria means more energy is needed for their proliferation [39]. Moreover, longer steeping periods can soften these seeds to the point where bacterial and fungal deterioration becomes likely after sowing.

According to Okamoto and Joly [40], a prolonged priming duration can even lead to hypoxia which can reduce percent germination. Nonetheless, some studies have identified the growth promotion potential of some bacterial species in the area of germination percentage. In a study by Pooja et al. [41], chicken pea seeds (a member of the legume family) bio-primed with Bacillus valezensis (MNB08) were found to show enhanced final germination. The application of Bacillus velezensis strain CMRP 4490 as a coating film on soybean seeds also improved germination [42].

Using the conventional priming method, which involves steeping and then drying seeds to their original moisture content, cowpea seeds bio-primed for 6 hours with either Trichoderma viridae or Pseudomonas florescence gave improved germination percentage [43]. In another study by Aminu et al. [44], where 3 different priming durations (4, 6, and 8 h) were used, 8 h was found to be the priming duration for superior performance in terms of stand count and plant heights after 8 weeks of sowing for two varieties of soybean at two different locations. The results of hydropriming experiments by Mehri [45] revealed that 18 hours of priming was necessary for improved final germination and yield in soybean.

The high optimal priming durations reported in these studies are not unusual, even if they are not consistent with the results in this study, because these studies used the conventional priming technique. Seeds in the current study were planted directly, hence the lower optimal steeping duration was reported. The lack of a consistent relationship between steeping duration and final germination for sorghum and sesame, two important crops well-adapted for growth under arid conditions, could be linked to their seed structures which perhaps limited over-imbibition, which could have occurred at longer steeping durations, as FPG of 100% (or close to) were obtained for virtually all the isolates, even at longer steeping durations (i.e., 4 and 5 hours). That is, longer steeping durations did not result in bloated seeds which were visually observed for cowpea and soybean in this study. Ituen et al. [46] discovered that the sorghum took 48 h to reach full water absorption capacity, showing the imperviousness of the seed. The best hydropriming duration for improved germination performance in sesame was 12 hours [47]. Teshome [48] reported an increase in final percent germination as priming duration increased for virtually all varieties of the sorghum tested against all priming treatments, up to 10 hours, then it decreased. Tizazu et al. [49] also recorded the best mean germination value (91.5%) for seeds primed in water for 12 hours for sesame using the convention priming method. Since the main goal of bacterial seed priming is the adherence of beneficial species to the spermosphere and imbibition of water and, to a much lesser extent, bioactive bacterial metabolites that can promote plant growth; therefore, longer steeping durations were not utilized in this study.

Generally, rather low FPG values were obtained in this study for okra. It ranged from a measly 7.14 to 64.29% for the isolates. Lethargic and irregular germination pattern has been a major problem in okra production due to the hardness of the seed coat [50-52]. This slows down the imbibition of liquid, meaning that seemingly viable seeds could have slow, erratic, and uneven germination patterns. The hydropriming basil seeds, a very hardy seed like okra, required 12 hours of priming to produce a significant effect [53] but in this study, the highest steeping duration was 5 hours. In the case of okra, it is possible that longer steeping periods would have given rise to a more improved germination pattern. Softer seeds will even promote bacterial adherence since a longer steeping durations will soften the seed.

Mean germination time indicates the germination rate and time spread of germination [54]. It gives information about the average time taken for germinated seeds to appear. The lower the MGT, the quicker the germination of a seed lot. Two seed lots can have different FGPs but the same MGT and vice versa. This implies that one parameter must be interpreted in light of the other. In this study, a stable value of around 5 days, with very few exceptions across the different steeping durations for the 5 crops. As an example, rather low values were obtained at 2 h (inoculum A), 1, 3, and 4 h (inoculum B), 1 h (inoculum C), and 2 and 5 h (inoculum E). These low values should be interpreted in the light of FPG, which was low for all of them. This implies that low FPG can generate misleadingly low mean germination time.

In this study, no observable patterns with steeping duration were obtained for the isolates across all crops. In other words, the impact of increasing steeping duration on mean germination time was minimal. However, some researchers have found reduced mean germination time in their studies through different priming methods [55-57].

The germination index combines percent germination and speed to give a more balanced view of germination. In this index formula, more weight is given to seeds that germinate earlier than seeds that germinate later on. Therefore, a higher germination index value indicates a faster percentage of germination and speed [58]. For cowpea, soybean, sorghum, and sesame, the highest germination index values were obtained at mostly shorter steeping durations for many of the isolates, although statistical parity with values from longer steeping periods was sometimes observed. This implies that shorter steeping durations are likely sufficient for improved germination by these Bacillus species. However, for okra, the highest index values were not limited to the shorter steeping durations which is likely as a result of the hard seed coat. These means that a longer steeping period is likely necessary for okra.

The seedling vigor index is simply a product of the seedling height and final germination percentage. This index is a simple yet effective measure of plant biomass in a seed lot. Early vigorous growth is typically linked to improved yield [59]. For cowpea, the best vigor index values were obtained at 2 h or 3 for most of the isolates. Even when longer steeping periods posted the highest vigor index, as in the case of inoculums C and D, they were not statistically different from values obtained at shorter steeping periods. This same cowpea pattern was observed for other crops.

Similarly, cowpea seeds bio-primed in Pseudomonas fluorescence for 6 hours and dried to original moisture content produced an improved vigor index [43]. In this study, cowpea seeds became bloated at longer steeping durations (4 and 5 h), and this negatively affected germination and consequently resulted in stunted growth, which ultimately produced low vigor index values. The subsequent drying of seeds in conventional priming ensured this difference between the optimal steeping durations obtained in this study and the one highlighted above. Bacillus megatarium was found to have a positive effect on the seedling vigor index of soybean after 8 days of sowing [60].

Overall, a relatively short steeping duration is required for bacterial priming of cowpea and soybean based on the vigor index data in this study. The vigor index measures plant biomass which is closely related to plant productivity. Again, the limited impact of biopriming time with these Bacillus species on the vigor index values of sesame and sorghum could be due to their unique structures. Also, okra is noted for its slow, erratic, and non-uniform germination pattern due to its seed hardiness. Therefore, a much longer steeping period than employed in this study may be appropriate for these three crops in bacterial priming.

Initial inoculum concentration of the isolates did not seem to show a consistent trend with final percent germination and mean germination time for all the crops. This means that the priming potential of the isolates is not directly linked to their concentration for these two parameters. This is not unsurprising since blotters have a low abundance of competing bacterial species, so a higher concentration is not necessary for effective colonization and promotion activity. Apart from this, bacterial species are capable of rapid proliferation under the right conditions, therefore the use of very higher concentrations may be superfluous. On the contrary, other priming methods involving the use of chemicals typically shown a concentration-dependent mode with typically drastic and deleterious effects at higher concentrations [60, 61].

Inoculum concentrations of the isolates did not seem to affect germination index values for sorghum, sesame, and okra. On the contrary, a mountain-shape trend for germination index was observed for isolates A and B for cowpea and soybean and isolates B and E for soybean alone, and isolate C gave a mountain-shaped trend for cowpea. Although, in some of these cases, statistical parity between values from different concentrations was observed.

There was an increase in vigor index with increasing concentration up to C2 or C3 for isolates A, B, and E for cowpea and isolates A, B, and C for soybean before a general decline in values was observed. For cowpea, isolate C produced a downward trend with increasing concentration for cowpea. Statistical equivalence was also observed between different concentrations. This could mean that after a certain concentration level, a diminishing return occurs.

The reductions, which were mostly insignificant, in germination and vigor indices with increasing inoculum concentration observed for some isolates could be ascribed to the increasing concentration of some potentially harmful substances secreted by the isolates. Stamenov et al. [62] alluded to this possibility in their study in which they recorded reduced germination in Allium cepa involving the use of Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp.

The mechanisms responsible for this priming may include imbibition of the active growth promotion substances secreted by the bacterial species present in the medium and/or by direct colonization of the spermosphere, an effect that confers the pioneer advantage on these organisms when the seeds are later sown since early colonization can give the organisms a significant head start. This colonization can also enable potential plant growth promotion potential to establish itself first in an area (creating a physical niche) and possibly antagonize deleterious species through the production of antimicrobial agents. Effective colonization ensures that plant growth-promoting bacteria are better able to positively impact plant development [63].

Mechanisms of growth promotion that have been identified for Bacillus species include nitrogen fixation, solubilization and mineralization of phosphorus and other nutrients, phytohormone production, production of siderophores, antimicrobial compounds, and hydrolytic enzymes, induced systemic resistance (ISR) and tolerance to abiotic stresses [64]. In the study, nitrogen fixation can be excluded because of the time required for the nitrogen fixation process to be set up in plants and, also, solubilization and mineralization of phosphate that cotton wool was used as blotters and not soil, which can typically contain insoluble and organic phosphates that can be solubilized or mineralized.

CONCLUSION

To summarize, optimization of priming parameters is seldom attempted with bacterial paraments. The results shows that different seeds behave differently to bacterial priming. This study highlights the importance of steeping duration for seeds with large, hydrophilic endosperms such as cowpea and soybean during bacterial priming. For sorghums and sesame, cereals with small endosperms and impervious seed structure, the results were varied and steeping duration seemed to produce minimal impact on them. Also, the impervious nature of the seed coat of okra necessitates the use of higher steeping durations in future studies with bacterial priming. While chemical priming can have drastic and negative impact on growth parameters at high concentrations as reported by other studies, effect of changing inoculum concentration seems to be more subtle in this study. A full statistical optimization of the parameters for biopriming can help scale down the use of environmentally unfriendly options such as chemical primers. Further research under soil conditions will help in this regard.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

PGPB = Plant growth-promoting bacteria
FGP = Final germination percentage
MGT = Mean germination time
GIX = Germination index
VIX = Vigor index

RESAERCH INVOLVING PLANTS

The seeds were identified and authenticated at the Herbarium of the Department of Plant Sciences, University of Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria and the following voucher numbers were obtained: cowpea (UICH/004/1491/2022), soya bean (UILH/003/1490/2022), sorghum (UILH/002/1489/2022), sesame (UILH/005/1492/2022), and okra (UILH/001/ 1488/2022).

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data and supportive information are available within the article.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria, for providing the resources and facilities for the study.

REFERENCES

1
Backer R, Rokem JS, Ilangumaran G, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci 2018; 9: 1473.
2
De La Torre-Ruiz N, Ruiz-Valdiviezo VM, Rincón-Molina CI, et al. Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria on the growth and fructan production of Agave americana L. Braz J Microbiol 2016; 47(3): 587-96.
3
Gamez R, Cardinale M, Montes M, Ramirez S, Schnell S, Rodriguez F. Screening, plant growth promotion and root colonization pattern of two rhizobacteria (Pseudomonas fluorescens Ps006 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bs006) on banana cv. Williams (Musa acuminata Colla). Microbiol Res 2019; 220: 12-20.
4
Kloepper JW. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. Proceedings of the 4th Internet Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. Angers, France. 1978; pp. 2: 879-82.
5
Ramakrishna W, Yadav R, Li K. Plant growth promoting bacteria in agriculture: Two sides of a coin. Appl Soil Ecol 2019; 138: 10-8.
6
Abdelaal KA, Sahar FT. Response of sugar beet plant (Beta vulgaris L.) to mineral nitrogen fertilization and bio-fertilizers. Int J Curr Microbiol 2015; 4(9): 677-88.
7
Abdelaal KA. Pivotal role of bio and mineral fertilizer combinations on morphological, anatomical and yield characters of sugar beet plant (Beta vulgaris L.). Mid East J Agricul Res 2015; 4(4): 717-34.
8
Abdelaal KA, Badawy SA, Abdel Aziz RM, Neana SM. Effect of mineral nitrogen levels and PGPR on morphophysiological characters of three sweet sorghum varieties (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Int J Plant Prod 2015; 2015: 189-203.
9
Egamberdieva D, Wirth SJ, Alqarawi AA, Abd Allah EF, Hashem A. Phytohormones and beneficial microbes: Essential components for plants to balance stress and fitness. Front Microbiol 2017; 8: 2104.
10
James EK. Nitrogen fixation in endophytic and associative symbiosis. Field Crops Res 2000; 65(2-3): 197-209.
11
Haas D, Défago G. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005; 3(4): 307-19.
12
McDonald MB. Seed deterioration: Physiology, repair and assessment. Seed Sci Technol 1999; 27: 177-237.
13
Nawaz A, Farooq M, Cheema SA, Yasmeen A, Wahid A. Stay green character at grain filling ensures resistance against terminal drought in wheat. Int J Agric Biol 2013; 15(6): 1272-6.
14
Lutts S, Benincasa P, Wojtyla L, et al. Seed priming: new comprehensive approaches for an old empirical technique.New Challenges in Seed Biology - Basic and Translational Research Driving Seed Technology. intechopen 2016; pp. 1-212.
15
Job D, Capron I, Job C, Dacher F, Corbineau F, Côme D. Identification of germination-specific protein markers and their use in seed priming technology. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Seeds. Merida, Mexico. Wallingford UK: CABI Publishing 1999; pp. 449-59.
16
Tzortzakis NG. Effect of pre-sowing treatment on seed germination and seedling vigour in endive and chicory. Hortic Sci 2009; 36(3): 117-25.
17
Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Pre-sowing seed treatment-A shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth, and crop yield under saline and non‐saline conditions. Adv Agron 2005; 88: 223-71.
18
McQuilken MP, Halmer P, Rhodes DJ. Application of microorganisms to seeds.Formulation of microbial biopesticides: beneficial microorganisms, nematodes and seed treatments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998; pp. 255-85.
19
Prasad S, Kamble UR, Sripathy KV, Udaya Bhaskar K, Singh DP. Seed bio-priming for biotic and abiotic stress management.Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity. New Delhi: Springer 2016; 1: pp. 211-28.
20
Anitha D, Vijaya T, Reddy NV, Venkateswarlu N, Pragathi D, Mouli KC. Microbial endophytes and their potential for improved bioremediation and biotransformation: A review. Indo Am J Pharma Res 2013; 3: 6408-17.
21
Jensen B, Poulsen FV, Knudsen IM, Jensen DF. Combining microbial seed treatment with priming of carrot seeds for control of seed borne Alternaria spp. IOBC WPRS Bull 2001; 24(3): 197-202.
22
Callan NW, Mathre DE, Miller JB. Field performance of sweet corn seed bio-primed and coated with Pseudomonas fluorescens AB254. HortScience 1991; 26(9): 1163-5.
23
Harman GE, Taylor AG. Improved seedling performance by integration of biological control agents at favorable pH levels with solid matrix priming. Phytopathology 1988; 78(5): 520-5.
24
Legro B, Satter H, Bradford K, Hartz T. Biological control of Pythium through seed coating and seed priming with Trichoderma. Proceedings of the 4th National Symposium on Stand Establishment of Horticultural Crops. Monterey, California. 1995; pp. 1995; 235-7.
25
Warren JE, Bennett MA. Bio-osmopriming tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) seeds for improved seedling establishment. Seed biology: advances and applications. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Seeds. Merida, Mexico. Wallingford UK: CABI Publishing 1999; pp. 477-87.
26
Basu A, Prasad P, Das SN, et al. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: Recent developments, constraints, and prospects. Sustainability 2021; 13(3): 1140.
27
Kamran S, Shahid I, Baig DN, Rizwan M, Malik KA, Mehnaz S. Contribution of zinc solubilizing bacteria in growth promotion and zinc content of wheat. Front Microbiol 2017; 8: 2593.
28
Ahmad I, Ahmad M, Hussain A, Jamil M. Integrated use of phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus subtilis strain IA6 and zinc-solubilizing Bacillus sp. strain IA16: A promising approach for improving cotton growth. Folia Microbiol 2021; 66(1): 115-25.
29
Grover M, Bodhankar S, Sharma A, Sharma P, Singh J, Nain L. PGPR mediated alterations in root traits: Way toward sustainable crop production. Front Sustain Food Syst 2021; 4: 618230.
30
Saleem S, Iqbal A, Ahmed F, Ahmad M. Phytobeneficial and salt stress mitigating efficacy of IAA producing salt tolerant strains in Gossypium hirsutum. Saudi J Biol Sci 2021; 28(9): 5317-24.
31
Leggatt CW, Justice OL, Hay WD, Elliott GA, Davidson WA, LaPine LJ. Rules for testing seeds: Association of official seed analysts. Proceedings of the Association of Official Seed Analysts. 23-59.
32
Ellis RH, Covell S, Roberts EH, Summerfield RJ. The influence of temperature on seed germination rate in grain legumes: II. Intraspecific variation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) at constant temperatures. J Exp Bot 1986; 37(10): 1503-15.
33
Salehzade H, Shishvan MI, Ghiyasi M, Forouzin F, Siyahjani AA. Effect of seed priming on germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Res J Biol Sci 2009; 4(5): 629-31.
34
Abdul-Baki AA, Anderson JD. Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria 1. Crop Sci 1973; 13(6): 630-3.
35
Al-Saad LA, Al-Zaalan AR. Evaluating the efficiency of ethanol precipitation method in purification of gDNA and PCR product. Basrah J Agricul Sci 2019; 32: 276-81.
36
Scott SJ, Jones RA, Williams WA. Review of data analysis methods for seed germination 1. Crop Sci 1984; 24(6): 1192-9.
37
Afrin S, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Sakil MA, Sohag AA, Polash MA, Hossain MA. Hydrogen peroxide priming alleviates chilling stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by enhancing oxidant scavenging capacity. Fund Appl Agricul 2019; 4(1): 713-22.
38
Shiade SRG, Boelt B. Seed germination and seedling growth parameters in nine tall fescue varieties under salinity stress. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci 2020; 70(6): 485-94.
39
Basavaraj GL, Murali M, Lavanya SN, Amruthesh KN. Seed priming with biotic agents invokes defense response and enhances plant growth in pearl millet upon infection with Magnaporthe grisea. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 2019; 21: 101279.
40
Okamoto JM, Joly CA. Ecophysiology and respiratory metabolism during the germination of Inga sessilis (Vell.) Mart. (Mimosaceae) seeds subjected to hypoxia and anoxia. Rev Bras Bot 2000; 23(1): 51-7.
41
Pooja K, S RR, Neelkamal R. An assessment of two application methods involving the use of Bacillus spp. against Sclerotium rolfsii for plant growth-promotion and disease management of chickpea. Int J Zool Invest 2021; 7(2): 471-8.
42
Teixeira GM, Mosela M, Nicoletto MLA, et al. Genomic insights into the antifungal activity and plant growth-promoting ability in Bacillus velezensis CMRP 4490. Front Microbiol 2021; 11: 618415.
43
Pradhan RL, Moaharana N, Ranasingh KA. Biswal, Bordolui SK. Effect of seed priming on different physiological parameters of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) seeds collected from Western Odisha. Pharma Innov J 2022; 11(6): 2338-43.
44
Aminu MS, Ahmed AA, Bukar MA. Influence of seed hydro priming duration on growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max. L. Merr) in the Sudan Savannah. FUDMA J SCI 2022; 6(4): 232-7.
45
Mehri S. Effect of seed priming on yield and yield components of soybean. Am-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 2015; 15(3): 399-403.
46
Ituen EUU, Mittal JP, Adeoti JS. Water absorption in cereal grains and its effect on their rupture stress. J Food Process Eng 1986; 8(3): 147-58.
47
Ahmad G, Lee HC. Response of sesame (Sesamum indicum) cultivars to hydropriming of seeds. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 2011; 1: 638-42.
48
Teshome W, Tana T, Dechassa N, Singh TN. Effect of seed priming on germination and seedling growth of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) varieties. East Africa J Sci 2018; 12(1): 51-60.
49
Tizazu Y, Ayalew D, Terefe G, Assefa F. Evaluation of seed priming and coating on germination and early seedling growth of sesame ( Sesamum indicum L.) under laboratory condition at Gondar, Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric 2019; 5(1): 1609252.
50
Felipe VP, Antonio AL, Francisco AP. Improvement of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). hardseedness by using microelements fertilizer. Hortic Bras 2010; 28(3): 232-5.
51
Pandita VK, Anand A, Nagarajan S, Seth R, Sinha SN. Solid matrix priming improves seed emergence and crop performance in okra. Seed Sci Technol 2010; 38(3): 665-74.
52
Lamichhane A, Mamata KC, Shrestha M. Effect of seed priming on germination of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus var. Arka Anamika). Malaysia J Sustain Agricul 2021; 5(2): 111-4.
53
Farahani HA, Moaveni P, Maroufi K. Effect of hydropriming on seedling growth of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Adv Environ Biol 2011; 2258-64.
54
Bewley JD, Bradford K, Hilhorst H. Seeds: physiology of development, germination and dormancy. 3rd. Springer Science & Business Media 2012.
55
Barupal S, Sharma R, Kumar M, et al. Standardization of priming duration of okra seed. Pharma Innov J 2022; 11(2S): 428-31.
56
Ali S, Alam M, Basir A, et al. Effect of seed priming on germination performance and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). Pak J Agric Res 2016; 29(3)
57
Shehzad M, Ayub M, Ahmad AU, Yaseen M. Influence of priming techniques on emergence and seedling growth of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). J Anim Plant Sci 2012; 22(1): 154-8.
58
Benech Arnold RL, Fenner M, Edwards PJ. Changes in germinability, ABA content and ABA embryonic sensitivity in developing seeds of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. induced by water stress during grain filling. New Phytol 1991; 118(2): 339-47.
59
Carter DC, Harris D, Youngquist JB, Persaud N. Soil properties, crop water use and cereal yields in Botswana after additions of mulch and manure. Field Crops Res 1992; 30(1-2): 97-109.
60
Miljaković D, Marinković J, Tamindžić G, et al. Bio-priming of soybean with Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Bacillus megaterium: Strategy to improve seed germination and the initial seedling growth. Plants 2022; 11(15): 1927.Chauhan P, Pandey G, Pandey PK. Priming with potassium solutions improves seedling growth and vigor in forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). J Appl Nat Sci 2016; 8(4): 1937-40.
61
Arif M, Jan MT, Marwat KB, Khan MA. Seed priming improves emergence and yield of soybean. Pak J Bot 2008; 40(3): 1169-77.
62
Stamenov D, Djuric S, Jafari TH. Effect of PGPR on the germination and early development of onion (Allium cepa). Proceedings of the ISER 137th International Conference. Paris, France. 2018; pp. 6-9.
63
Compant S, Clément C, Sessitsch A. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: Their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 2010; 42(5): 669-78.
64
Goswami D, Thakker JN, Dhandhukia PC. Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review. Cogent Food Agric 2016; 2(1): 1127500.